Logical Reasoning · Weaken EXCEPT
PrepTest 124 · Section 2 · Question 16
Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.
Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first
- “more hurt than help”
- “however”
- “finally”
- “EXCEPT”
Playground logic
Frankie's top bun: Ms. Rivera's longer-recess plan does more hurt than help. The patty is a list of harms. Anything that adds a benefit or shrinks a harm pops the argument; a plain fact about the plan's schedule just sits there.
Step 2 · The kid story
Frankie Against Longer Recess
Ms. Rivera floats an idea: make recess twenty minutes longer. Frankie objects at once. "This hurts more than it helps! First, we'd lose math time. Second, kids would come back too tired to focus. Third, the lunch helpers would have to stay later." Sharon, who always disagrees with Frankie, starts popping his argument. "Kids who get more recess focus better, so they finish math faster." "The lunch helpers actually asked for more hours." "Longer recess cuts hallway fights, so the principal saves hours every week." "That tired feeling disappears ten minutes after we sit down." Then Marcus adds, "Also, the extra minutes would come on Mondays more than Fridays." Sharon turns. "That doesn't help me or Frankie, Marcus. It's just a schedule fact."
Step 3 · Try the model question
Frankie: Some people want recess made twenty minutes longer. But this would do more hurt than help. We would lose math time, kids would come back too tired to focus, and the lunch helpers would have to stay later.
Every choice below would undercut Frankie, except which one?
Step 4 · The courtroom tale
The Fountain Fight
A council member argues that a new fountain in the park would do more hurt than help: it costs water, it attracts pigeons, and the gardeners must clean it. Mr. Whitfield answers point by point. "Your Honor, the fountain recycles its water. Pigeons already gather there. And the fountain draws visitors whose donations pay for two more gardeners." A clerk raises a hand. "Also, the fountain would run longer in summer than in winter." Mr. Whitfield pauses. "True, but that neither adds good nor removes harm. My other points tip the scale. That one just sits on the table." The judge nods.
Step 5 · Work the real question
Open PrepTest 124, Section 2, Question 16 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.
Your answer
How to apply it
Identify the conclusion as a scale: harms outweigh benefits. List the harms the argument names. Now test each choice: does it add a benefit, shrink a named harm, or show a harm is offset? If yes, it weakens. The answer is the choice that does none of these. Do not overthink: you need the one that leaves the scale exactly where it was.