VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Flaw

PrepTest 152 · Section 2 · Question 22

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Flaw
The one idea it tests
The evidence quietly takes the conclusion for granted, so the argument walks in a circle.
The basic logic
Write the top bun. Then read the patty slowly, looking for a word or label that already assumes the top bun is true. If the support only works once you believe the conclusion, it is the Circle.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “original”
  • “clear”
  • “inferred”
  • “again”

Playground logic

Marcus says the first version of tag had no bases, and his proof is that when bases go missing, kids go back to the original no-bases game. Calling it 'the original' already assumes his top bun. That is the Circle.

Step 2 · The kid story

The Original Tag

Marcus climbed the slide to make an announcement. "Nobody wrote down when tag was invented, but it's clear the very first tag had no bases. Bases came later." Owen squinted. "How do you know?" "Simple," Marcus said. "Whenever the orange cones go missing, kids go back to the original no-bases tag. And when the cones come back, they switch right away." Priya set down her juice box. "Marcus, you said they go back to the original game. But whether no-bases tag is the original is the very thing you're trying to prove." Marcus opened his mouth, then closed it. Lulu wrote on her clipboard: Proof uses the answer. Kevin added helpfully, "Dinosaurs played tag first, probably." Nobody could prove him wrong either.

Step 3 · Try the model question

Marcus: No one recorded when tag began, but clearly the first tag game had no bases, and bases came later. We know this because whenever the cones go missing, kids go back to the original no-bases game, and switch back to bases as soon as the cones return.

Which choice best describes a weakness in Marcus's reasoning?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Case of the First Recipe

Two bakers argued over who invented the town's famous pie. The first baker's lawyer stood. "Your Honor, it's clear the first version was plain apple, and the cinnamon came later. Whenever the cinnamon supply runs out, every bakery returns to the original plain apple recipe." Mr. Whitfield rose, thumbs in his suspenders. "Your Honor, counsel calls plain apple 'the original.' But that is exactly what he's supposed to prove. His evidence wears the conclusion like a name tag." The judge chuckled. "A pie can't prove it came first by calling itself first. Try again, counsel, with fresh evidence."

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 152, Section 2, Question 22 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Put the top bun in your own words. Then reread each premise and ask: does this sentence only make sense if I already believe the conclusion? Watch for labels that sneak the answer in. If you find one, choose the answer that says a premise presupposes the conclusion. Be wary of choices about timing, causes, history as a reason to act, or premises that clash, unless the argument truly does that.