VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Reading Comprehension · Inference

PrepTest 147 · Section 2 · Question 23

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Inference
The one idea it tests
Apply a definition: pick the case where someone is made to do exactly what they promised.
The basic logic
Pin down the passage's definition of the remedy: an order to carry out the deal as agreed. Then test each scenario. Payments, refunds, cancellations and handing money to someone else are not the remedy. Only an order to perform the original deal counts.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “precisely”
  • “as agreed”
  • “instead of”

Playground logic

In the kid passage, the Do-It Rule means making a kid do exactly what was promised, like making Tommy hand Kevin the card.

Step 2 · The kid passage

This question belongs to Passage 4 (Questions 23–27). Read its kid passage and structure guide first: Ms. Rivera's Promise Court →

Step 3 · Try the model question

Which is the clearest example of Ms. Rivera using the Do-It Rule?

Choices

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 147, Section 2, Question 23 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Open Question 23 in your official copy and answer it first.

Write the definition in one line: the court orders the deal performed as agreed. Check each choice for that exact action. Rule out any choice where money changes hands instead, where the deal is canceled, or where something is returned or redirected rather than performed. The survivor fits the definition.