VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Paradox

PrepTest 113 · Section 3 · Question 11

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Paradox
The one idea it tests
People keep a choice that causes a problem; the explanation shows the problem could be fixed without giving up the choice.
The basic logic
Fact one: the choice has big benefits. Fact two: it brings a real downside and there was an alternative. Find the answer that lets both facts shake hands, usually by showing the downside was handled another way.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “yet”
  • “although”
  • “still”

Playground logic

Nadia switched to plastic beads because they are fast and cheap, but her bracelets started breaking. Still, she kept the plastic. The puzzle melts once we learn a cheap extra step fixed the breaking, so she could keep the speed and lose the problem.

Step 2 · The kid story

Nadia's Bracelet Business

Nadia ran a bracelet table at the school fair. Last spring she switched from wooden beads to plastic ones. Plastic beads were faster to string, and one bag made twice as many bracelets. But soon customers came back with sad faces. The plastic bracelets snapped. Owen frowned. "Wooden beads never broke. Why not switch back?" Nadia kept using plastic anyway. Owen was baffled until Priya peeked at Nadia's workbench. There was a spool of thick thread from Aunt Rosa's sewing box. "After a few weeks I found out," Nadia said, "that if I double-knot the string with this extra thread, the plastic bracelets stop breaking." Owen grinned. "So you keep the speed and fix the snapping. Mystery solved."

Step 3 · Try the model question

Nadia switched from wooden to plastic beads because plastic bracelets are quicker to make and one bag makes more of them. Soon after, her bracelets started snapping. Yet she kept using plastic beads, even though she could have gone back to wood.

Which one of the following, if it were true, would best account for Nadia's decision to keep using plastic beads?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Case of the Squeaky Wheels

The bus company was sued for keeping cheap plastic wheels on its school buses after they began squeaking loudly. Attorney Grant thundered, "Rubber wheels were available! Why keep the noisy ones?" Mr. Whitfield called the head mechanic. "Tell us what happened after the squeaking began." The mechanic smiled. "We learned that a few drops of a common oil, which we already keep in the garage, stop the squeak completely." Mr. Whitfield turned to the jury. "The plastic wheels last longer and cost less. The squeak was real, but fixable. Keeping the wheels was not foolish. It was smart." The judge marked the puzzle solved.

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 113, Section 3, Question 11 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Write both sides of the puzzle in your own words: the benefits that drew people to the choice, and the downside that should have pushed them away. Then look for the answer that lets them keep the choice sensibly, such as a way to cure the downside without dropping the choice. Toss answers about different times or groups, and answers that make the downside worse.