VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Weaken

PrepTest 112 · Section 3 · Question 2

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Weaken
The one idea it tests
A prediction says a faster, more targeted option will crush an old option. It assumes people use the old option ONLY for the job the new one does better.
The basic logic
Find the hidden assumption: the old way has no other value. Pop it by showing people use the old way for a second reason the new way does not offer.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “since”
  • “will”
  • “drastically”
  • “if”

Playground logic

Marcus's patty: the order button gets kids exactly the lunch they want, faster. His top bun: buffet line traffic will crash. The secret sauce is that kids only use the line to grab what they already want, so a fact about a second reason to walk the line pops the burger.

Step 2 · The kid story

The Lunch Button

The school cafeteria got a shiny new gadget: a lunch-order button. You press a picture of the dish you want, and two minutes later a tray slides out of a little window. No waiting, no hunting. Marcus was thrilled. "This is the end of the buffet line! Why would anyone shuffle past twelve trays when the button hands you exactly what you want, faster?" Lulu checked her clipboard. She had spent all week watching the buffet line. "Lots of kids do not know what they want when they walk in," she said. "They wander down the line, see something weird like purple potato pancakes, and try it just for fun. The button only gives you what you already picked." Marcus paused mid-cheer. "So the line does a second job the button cannot do?" Lulu nodded. "Exactly."

Step 3 · Try the model question

The new lunch-order button gives each student exactly the dish they choose, faster than the buffet line can. Since the button is quicker and more precise, Marcus concludes that buffet line use will drop sharply once the button is installed.

Suppose each choice is true. Which one does the most damage to Marcus's prediction?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Case of the Jigsaw Shop

A toy company sued a puzzle shop's landlord, claiming the shop was doomed and the lease should end early. Their lawyer, Ms. Petrakis, argued: "Our new app shows any puzzle picture you want, instantly. Since people want pictures fast, the puzzle shop will lose its customers." Mr. Whitfield rose, suspenders gleaming. "Your Honor, people do not buy puzzles just to see a picture. They buy them to spend a slow, cozy evening snapping pieces together with family. The app does not give them that." The judge peered over her glasses. "So the shop sells something the app cannot replace. The prediction assumes the picture is the only reason anyone buys a puzzle. Request denied."

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 112, Section 3, Question 2 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Find the top bun: a prediction that the old option will fade. Find the patty: the new option does one job faster or better. Name the secret sauce: people use the old option only for that one job. Look for the choice that gives the old option a second use the new one lacks. Skip choices that are off topic or that only echo a premise.