VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Inference

PrepTest 111 · Section 4 · Question 21

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Inference / Must Be True
The one idea it tests
Chain the premises, then read the chain backwards with the contrapositive.
The basic logic
Link the statements: certain roles carry the values, so removing roles shakes the values. Flip the chain: if values cannot be shaken, then roles there are not being removed in that way. Stay inside the lunchbox and beware answers that reverse the arrow or blow it up into 'all'.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “all”
  • “therefore”
  • “tend to”

Playground logic

In Ms. Rivera's class, what the class values shows up in how much praise each class job gets. A gadget that wipes out a job tends to shake those values. Flip it: a class whose values cannot be shaken is not a class where a gadget can wipe out a job.

Step 2 · The kid story

The Robot Plant Waterer

Ms. Rivera's class runs on jobs: line leader, plant waterer, pencil sharpener. Every class has jobs. And you can tell what the class cares about by how much praise each job gets. The plant waterer gets a gold star every Friday. Then Grandpa donated a robot that waters the plants all by itself. No more plant waterer job. Suddenly nobody knew what a gold star was for. Kevin said, 'If the robot took the job, the class stops caring about plants, I guess?' Priya sipped her juice box. 'So here is the chain. Jobs carry what we value. A gadget that removes a job tends to shake what we value.' Lulu wrote on her clipboard: 'So a class whose values can never be shaken cannot be a class where gadgets remove jobs.' Priya gave her a high five.

Step 3 · Try the model question

Every class at school has class jobs. What a class values shows in how much praise each job receives. So it makes sense that, in any class, a gadget that makes some class job unnecessary will tend to shake up that class's values.

Which answer do the statements above best back up?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Guild of Lamplighters

Mr. Whitfield addressed Judge Pemberton. 'Your Honor, the old town honored its lamplighters above all, and the honor given to each job showed what the town held dear. When automatic lamps arrived, the lamplighter job vanished, and the town's sense of what mattered wobbled.' The opposing lawyer scoffed. 'So what?' Mr. Whitfield smiled. 'So, Your Honor, if a town's values truly could never wobble, then it could not be a town where a machine is able to wipe out a job. The rule runs both ways once you flip it properly.' The judge wrote that down. 'Contrapositive accepted. Not the reverse, mind you. Just the flip.'

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 111, Section 4, Question 21 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Turn the passage into a chain: one thing is built on roles, so removing roles tends to disturb it. Write the contrapositive too. Then test each answer against the chain and its contrapositive. Keep only the answer that the chain actually guarantees, read in a proper direction. For every other choice, ask whether the passage truly forces it, or whether it needs a word, a direction, or a situation the passage never supplies.