VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Parallel Flaw

PrepTest 103 · Section 1 · Question 21

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Parallel Flaw
The one idea it tests
"Not all A are B" plus "all C are A" does not prove that some C are not B; the C group might be exactly the A's that are B.
The basic logic
X-Ray the argument into letters: some A are not B; every C is an A; so some C are not B. The flaw: the small group could sit entirely inside the good part. Find the answer with the same quantifiers in the same slots and the same leap.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “not all”
  • “every”
  • “must be”

Playground logic

Marcus's patty: not all shiny stickers smell. Lulu's book is all shiny stickers. His top bun: so some of Lulu's stickers don't smell. The leak: Lulu might have picked only the shiny ones that do smell.

Step 2 · The kid story

The Scratch-and-Sniff Sting

Marcus inspected Lulu's sticker book with a magnifying glass. "Fact one," he said. "Not every shiny sticker is scratch-and-sniff. I have a shiny dinosaur that smells like nothing." "That's Kevin's dinosaur," said Tommy. "Fact two," Marcus went on. "Every sticker in Lulu's book is shiny. So, case closed: some of Lulu's stickers must not smell." Lulu held up her clipboard. "I only collect shiny stickers that smell. That is my whole rule. I sniff before I trade." Marcus scratched a cupcake sticker. Cupcake. He scratched a rocket. Somehow, also cupcake. He scratched a frog. Grape. "Okay," he said. "Some shiny stickers don't smell. But that doesn't mean Lulu's don't." "Her book could be all the smelly ones," Priya said. Marcus quietly put his magnifying glass away.

Step 3 · Try the model question

Not every shiny sticker is scratch-and-sniff. Every sticker in Lulu's book is shiny. So some of the stickers in Lulu's book must not be scratch-and-sniff.

Which argument has the same faulty pattern as Marcus's?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Case of the Grumpy Goats

At the county fair hearing, Mr. Whitfield argued against a petting zoo. "Not all farm goats are gentle. Every goat in this petting zoo came from a farm. Therefore, some of these goats must be ill-tempered." The zoo's owner raised her hand. "Your Honor, we picked only the gentle ones. We tested each goat with a toddler and a carrot." Judge Fairweather nodded. "Counselor, a mixed barn does not make a mixed petting zoo. A small group drawn from a big mixed group can still be all one kind." Mr. Whitfield looked at the goat chewing his tie. "This one is gentle," the owner said. "It just likes ties." The petition was denied.

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 103, Section 1, Question 21 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Translate the argument into letters: some A are not B; every C is an A; so some C are not B. Write that skeleton in your margin. Then translate each choice the same way, slot by slot, checking the quantifiers (not all, every, some). Throw out choices that are valid, that reverse a premise, or that use different quantifiers. The right one makes the same leap: assuming a subgroup must share the mix of the larger group.