VIPLSATCracking LSAT makes you a VIP.

Logical Reasoning · Necessary Assumption

PrepTest 101 · Section 3 · Question 13

Phase 1 (your first ~400 questions): read the guidance, then answer. No clock.

Step 1 · Pre-Question Guidance · read this first

Question type
Necessary Assumption
The one idea it tests
To blame a source for changing people's behavior, you must assume that being exposed to the source actually makes people more likely to copy it.
The basic logic
The patty only describes what the source shows or contains. The top bun says the source is changing the audience. The plank connecting them: exposure raises the chance of imitation. Pull the Plank: if exposure changes nothing, the claim collapses.
Tiny words that decide it
  • “because”
  • “influence”
  • “many”

Playground logic

Ms. Rivera says the older kids on the bus shout a lot, so riding the bus is making the little kids loud. Priya spots the plank: hearing the big kids shout must make the little ones more likely to shout too. Pull that plank and the bus is just a noisy bus.

Step 2 · The kid story

The Loudest Bus in Town

Ms. Rivera is worried about Bus 7. 'The fifth graders on that bus shout the whole ride,' she tells Grandpa at pickup. 'So riding Bus 7 is turning our second graders into shouters.' Lulu, who rides Bus 7, consults her clipboard. 'Hmm. The big kids do shout. But the little kids might just cover their ears and read.' Kevin, also a rider, adds, 'I only talk about dinosaurs, and I talk at a normal volume. Mostly.' Priya sips her juice box. 'Ms. Rivera's worry needs one hidden piece. Hearing the big kids shout has to make the little kids more likely to shout. If hearing it changes nothing, the bus can be loud without making anyone else loud.' Ms. Rivera writes that down. Then she asks Lulu to keep notes for a week.

Step 3 · Try the model question

Ms. Rivera claims that because the fifth graders on Bus 7 shout during most rides, riding Bus 7 is making the younger riders louder.

Ms. Rivera's claim depends on assuming which one of the following?

Choices

Step 4 · The courtroom tale

The Skate Park Complaint

A neighborhood group sued to close a skate park. 'The teenagers there do dangerous tricks,' their lawyer argued, 'so the park is making our younger children reckless.' Mr. Whitfield, for the park, approached the group's expert. 'Doctor, do you have any evidence that a child who watches a risky trick becomes more likely to try one?' The expert shuffled papers. 'Well, no. We simply counted the risky tricks.' Mr. Whitfield turned to the jury. 'Counting tricks proves the teenagers are daring. It proves nothing about the children unless watching makes copying more likely. That link is the whole case, and nobody has shown it.' The judge underlined something on her notepad.

Step 5 · Work the real question

Open PrepTest 101, Section 3, Question 13 in your official copy from LSAC (for example in LawHub) and read it there.

Your answer

How to apply it

Separate the evidence (what the source contains) from the conclusion (that the audience is being changed). Ask what must be true for the first to affect the second, and pre-phrase it: exposure makes people more likely to imitate. Use Pull the Plank on each contender; the right answer, when negated, cuts the link. Eliminate answers that run the influence backwards and Megaphones that demand much more than the claim needs.